Shabab Prepared for Decade of War

On Friday, the Shabab spokesman, Ali Dhere, spoke to the Islamic Radio Al-Furqan about the group’s long-term strategy in dealing with the onslaught from the 5 African militaries bolstering Somalia’s weak military.

As already apparent from the group’s actions – and as I have pointed out earlier in this blog and elsewhere – the Shabab have time as their best friend and do intend to stay alive until the foreign invaders get tired and leave.

However, the Shabab have kind of undermined their position in my opinion by announcing their expected timeframe for the withdrawal of AMISOM.

Ali Dhere started his announcement by claiming that the Shabab destroy up to 30 allied vehicles per month and kill an average of 3 enemy troops daily, therefore “90 soldiers are killed per month… And they are not sand we are digging up [that have no end]… these are human beings [that will eventually be finished].”

“…An enemy who has invaded a foreign land – if the people of that land do not disgrace themselves [by not fighting them] – cannot stay more than 10 years, according to our calculations and as we have seen from the most powerful and richest of invaders. A sufficient example is [the occupation of and eventual withdrawal from of] the Americans in Vietnam, the Russians in Afghanistan, the Americans in Iraq, and America with its western allies in Afghanistan”

So there you have it: the Shabab expect AMISOM not to stay for more than 10 years. It makes sense to assume that the group expects each country in AMISOM not to stay in Somalia for more than 10 years. In that case, what would happen if new countries kept coming in to replace the ones that may choose to withdraw?

The Shabab seem to have calculated that that won’t happen because they expect the western donors of AMISOM to run out of cash or the will to keep funding a mission that the Shabab seem to expect to have been considered a failure by then, much like Afghanistan today.

In Ali Dhere’s words: “The Africans [in AMISOM], who need aid and financial backing to stay here, have been here for 5 years… Their backers are being faced with financial and natural disasters such as the recent hurricane that God sent to the Americans… We can see victory in the horizon [in another 5 years]”.

If only they knew how cheap AMISOM is: it hasn’t cost the world in 5 years what Iraq cost the Americans in three weeks in 2003. I can see more outsourcing of wars by the west in the future. I hope future missions will be less merciless than AMISOM was in 2009-10 when it used to bomb civilian areas that were under Shabab control, as if it considered all people under Shabab rule as enemies. The mission did improve its record in subsequent years in the Mogadishu area (the Kenyans were perhaps the only AMISOM members in 2012 bombing civilians and insisting they were Shabab), but it has never been the perfect peacekeeping mission that one thinks about when one hears “peacekeeping mission”.

While the Shabab expect at least half a decade more of foreign interference according to their spokesman, they still control most of the towns and villages that are not on the main roads; even in government-controlled towns such as Marka, Afgoi, and others all across south and central Somalia, the Shabab still maintain local administrations in the villages just outside said towns. In fact, the allied forces attacking Shabab-held areas seem to be interested only in taking the main roads and whatever towns they happen to be passing through. The main Shabab bastions have always been off-road, and those will most likely be safely theirs in the foreseeable future.

Yes, the Shabab can manage to fight for 5 more years and more if need be. Sadly, given the low-budget nature of AMISOM, no one seems to be particularly eager to find a non-military solution despite the fact that the Shabab do have support in Somalia and have managed to fight for many years with mostly domestic backing.

As Al-Shabab decreases the number of its fighters and the big towns and cities it rules, it reduces its expenditure, increases efficiency of its reduced fighters who will mostly be the core reliable fighters, and be more of a pain in the ass to Somalia’s Federal government and its foreign muscle for many years to come.

Somebody asked me before Kismayo fell whether “that would be it”, that is, the loss that would make the Shabab “go”. My reply: the Shabab are here to stay. They are mostly Somalis; and as they have calculated, it is the non-Shabab foreigners that they expect to eventually leave.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Shabab Prepared for Decade of War

  1. Pam says:

    Hhmm interesting article and sadly has alot of truth in it.
    But to you Al Shabab, i wish to say that armed violence is the most destructive form of abuse of power, n won’t make u heroes to d Somali common citizen anyway. Violence is d ultimate strength of d weak – ur so weak! The Children n Women in Somalia are crying from fear, hunger, anguish n pain as a result of your atrocities. So much blood has already been shed, somali killing somali, black/arab killing black/arab don’t u think it’s a shame? You are destroying d trust of d people u would want to lead, now that is futile for ur strategy. Stand up n be counted. Stand up for peace n freedom. Stop priding urselves in violence n in d fact that AMISOM can’t stay forever. They r not supposed to stay forever anyway – we want our fathers/husbands/sons back home in Uganda a.s.a.p. If u have serious objections with ur current government, try civil resistence b’se it succeeds better than armed vioelnce, n believe me armed violence is not sustainable. Demonstrate to the common Somali that you can bring better change by putting forward ur agenda n rally them behind u thru civil means. No ruler can rule if people refuse to obey but disobedience doesn’t mean armed rebellion. We wannainchi in IGAD are tired of war n armed conflict. Our voices r crying out, crying out to you our leaders, actually not leaders but rulers. We r tired of living lives of uncertainity.

    And to u AMISOM n ur supporters, ur approach also ammounts to violence, only that it is more legitimate according to d Somali gov’t n a section of d p’ple n donors. But remember innocent civilians r also dying in d process n whatever u achieve thru violence u must protect n maintain thru violence so for how long r u going to help d Somali gov’t fight its own p’ple? So it’s high time an alternative approach to ending that conflict is sought rather than violent fighting. Peace keeping shdn’t involve use of arms n fire. Small arms e.g AK47 are a weapon of mass destruction in small forms. These r my views as a peace n conflict scholar.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s